RPAR vs. UPAR
RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) and UPAR (UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while UPAR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the NONE. RPAR is actively managed, while UPAR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RPAR returned 8.31%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for UPAR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPAR charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UPAR.
Performance
RPAR vs. UPAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than UPAR's 6.45% return.
RPAR
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 18.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
UPAR
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RPAR vs. UPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 5.38% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -21.64% |
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF | 6.45% | 23.87% | -2.26% | 5.73% | -30.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPAR and UPAR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between RPAR and UPAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPAR vs. UPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPAR
UPAR
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
RPAR
UPAR
Basic Materials
RPAR
UPAR
Energy
RPAR
UPAR
Healthcare
RPAR
UPAR
Communication Services
RPAR
UPAR
Industrials
RPAR
UPAR
Consumer Defensive
RPAR
UPAR
Utilities
RPAR
UPAR
Technology
RPAR
UPAR
Consumer Cyclical
RPAR
UPAR
Real Estate
RPAR
UPAR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPAR vs. UPAR — Risk / Return Rank
RPAR
UPAR
RPAR vs. UPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPAR | UPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.08 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 6.78 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPAR | UPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -0.06 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
RPAR vs. UPAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum UPAR drawdown of -39.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and UPAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPAR | UPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -39.00% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -11.13% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.20% | -18.73% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.58% | -7.07% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.60% | -21.77% | +10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 3.40% | -0.94% |
Volatility
RPAR vs. UPAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 3.94%, while UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPAR | UPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 5.35% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 11.94% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 13.98% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 18.10% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 18.10% | -5.39% |
RPAR vs. UPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPAR vs. UPAR - Dividend Comparison
RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than UPAR's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.11% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% |
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF | 2.71% | 3.28% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 4.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, RPAR and UPAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPAR has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to RPAR (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs UPAR's -39.00%.
On 3-year performance, UPAR leads with 9.24% vs 8.31% for RPAR. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UPAR has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UPAR.
UPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.11% for RPAR.
RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while UPAR is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and RPAR. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.65% for UPAR.
RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPAR and UPAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer