PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPAR vs. UPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPAR vs. UPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than UPAR's 6.45% return.


RPAR

1D
-2.12%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
5.38%
6M
5.53%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
8.31%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*

UPAR

1D
-3.35%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
24.18%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPAR vs. UPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
5.38%17.91%0.06%6.03%-21.64%
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
6.45%23.87%-2.26%5.73%-30.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and UPAR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022

0.92

The correlation between RPAR and UPAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPAR vs. UPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPAR
UPAR

Financial Services

35.9%
10.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
16.7%

Energy

5.9%
17.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.9%
5.2%

Industrials

2.1%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
3.5%

Utilities

0.2%
2.2%

Technology

0.1%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
6.3%

Real Estate

-0.0%
1.4%

Financial Services

RPAR
35.9%
UPAR
10.8%

Basic Materials

RPAR
6.4%
UPAR
16.7%

Energy

RPAR
5.9%
UPAR
17.8%

Healthcare

RPAR
5.1%
UPAR
5.0%

Communication Services

RPAR
4.9%
UPAR
5.2%

Industrials

RPAR
2.1%
UPAR
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

RPAR
0.3%
UPAR
3.5%

Utilities

RPAR
0.2%
UPAR
2.2%

Technology

RPAR
0.1%
UPAR
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RPAR
0.1%
UPAR
6.3%

Real Estate

RPAR
-0.0%
UPAR
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPAR vs. UPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

UPAR
UPAR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. UPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPARUPARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.08

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

6.78

+0.18

RPAR vs. UPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the UPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and UPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPARUPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-0.06

+0.40

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. UPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum UPAR drawdown of -39.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and UPAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPARUPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

-39.00%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-11.13%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

-18.73%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-7.07%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.60%

-21.77%

+10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.40%

-0.94%

Volatility

RPAR vs. UPAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 3.94%, while UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPARUPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

5.35%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

11.94%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

13.98%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

18.10%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.71%

18.10%

-5.39%

RPAR vs. UPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPAR vs. UPAR - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than UPAR's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.11%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
2.71%3.28%3.32%3.04%4.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RPAR and UPAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UPAR has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to RPAR (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs UPAR's -39.00%.

On 3-year performance, UPAR leads with 9.24% vs 8.31% for RPAR. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UPAR has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UPAR.

UPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.11% for RPAR.

RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while UPAR is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and RPAR. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.65% for UPAR.

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPAR and UPAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer