ROUS vs. SCHV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROUS returned 12.77%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

ROUS vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ROUS having a 14.41% return and SCHV slightly lower at 14.24%. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 12.77%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.38% annualized return.

ROUS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 12.40%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

SCHV

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 26.78%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 10.33%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	14.41%	15.21%	17.61%	15.05%	-9.65%	27.33%	6.61%	23.94%	-9.59%	22.88%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	14.24%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and SCHV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.83

The correlation between ROUS and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROUS vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROUS	SCHV
Technology	33.2%	18.2%
Healthcare	10.7%	11.3%
Financial Services	10.6%	19.6%
Industrials	10.4%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	6.9%
Communication Services	8.6%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	8.8%
Utilities	3.8%	4.6%
Energy	3.0%	7.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.8%
Real Estate	2.1%	4.1%

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 84
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROUS	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.50	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.51	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	3.94	+0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	15.87	+2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROUS vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROUS	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.50	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.71	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.67	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.71	-0.05

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-37.08%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-6.83%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-15.26%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	-19.78%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	-37.08%	+1.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-1.49%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-3.83%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	1.69%	-0.23%

Volatility

ROUS vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	3.33%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	8.37%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	10.80%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.40%	14.53%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	16.95%	+0.02%

ROUS vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ROUS vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than SCHV's 1.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.35%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.78%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROUS and SCHV in my portfolio?

ROUS and SCHV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROUS or SCHV?

SCHV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to ROUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, ROUS or SCHV?

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.77% vs 11.38% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROUS or SCHV?

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROUS or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROUS or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.35% for ROUS.

What is the main difference between ROUS and SCHV?

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.04% for SCHV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.