PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ROUS vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ROUS vs. RODM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM).

ROUS and RODM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROUS is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. RODM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. Both ROUS and RODM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ROUS vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROUS vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF		2.64%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF		6.61%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 11.65%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.

ROUS

1D
1.95%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
2.64%
6M
3.57%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
11.65%

RODM

1D
2.34%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
6.61%
6M
12.52%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF

Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF

Often compared with ROUS:
ROUS vs. PALCROUS vs. VFMFXROUS vs. DYNFROUS vs. VSMVROUS vs. SPMOROUS vs. OMFLROUS vs. SPHQ
Often compared with RODM:
RODM vs. NSRIXRODM vs. GLOFRODM vs. VYMIRODM vs. VEARODM vs. SCHFRODM vs. SPMORODM vs. ^GSPC

ROUS vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ROUSRODMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

2.36

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

3.08

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.29

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.56

15.59

-7.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROUS vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and RODM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ROUSRODMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.36

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.74

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.58

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.50

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and RODM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ROUS vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than RODM's 2.92% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF		1.50%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF		2.92%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, roughly equal to the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and RODM.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ROUSRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-35.98%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-9.40%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-28.85%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-35.98%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-4.11%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-6.47%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.98%

+0.30%

Volatility

ROUS vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 4.16%, while Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ROUSRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

5.36%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

7.91%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

13.37%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

13.42%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

15.21%

+1.73%