PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROM vs. UWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROM vs. UWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 55.07% return, which is significantly higher than UWM's 28.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed UWM with an annualized return of 40.84%, while UWM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.


ROM

1D
4.27%
1M
8.23%
YTD
55.07%
6M
46.89%
1Y
116.54%
3Y*
52.79%
5Y*
27.93%
10Y*
40.84%

UWM

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
28.31%
6M
23.79%
1Y
67.60%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROM vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
55.07%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
28.31%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and UWM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.73

The correlation between ROM and UWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROM vs. UWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROM
UWM

Technology

55.2%
17.0%

Financial Services

3.0%
15.8%

Energy

0.1%
6.1%

Industrials

0.0%
17.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

ROM
55.2%
UWM
17.0%

Financial Services

ROM
3.0%
UWM
15.8%

Energy

ROM
0.1%
UWM
6.1%

Industrials

ROM
0.0%
UWM
17.7%

Basic Materials

ROM

-

UWM
4.8%

Communication Services

ROM

-

UWM
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ROM

-

UWM
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ROM

-

UWM
2.4%

Healthcare

ROM

-

UWM
16.5%

Real Estate

ROM

-

UWM
6.1%

Utilities

ROM

-

UWM
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROM vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROMUWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

3.05

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

10.39

+0.58

ROM vs. UWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the UWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and UWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROMUWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.76

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.01

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.26

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.14

+0.38

Drawdowns

ROM vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, smaller than the maximum UWM drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and UWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMUWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.36%

-88.21%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.33%

-22.28%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.10%

-49.79%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.55%

-61.62%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.55%

-71.46%

+3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.50%

-6.15%

-8.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-30.87%

+10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.66%

6.52%

+4.14%

Volatility

ROM vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 21.34% compared to ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) at 13.04%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMUWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.34%

13.04%

+8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.89%

27.80%

+9.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.37%

38.72%

+5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.01%

45.12%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.04%

46.14%

+3.90%

ROM vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ROM and UWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

ROM vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than UWM's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.16%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.80%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROM and UWM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROM has higher volatility (21.34%) compared to UWM (13.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs UWM's -88.21%.

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 40.84% vs 11.84% for UWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 40.84% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROM and UWM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.16% for ROM.

ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%), while UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%).

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROM and UWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer