UWM vs. IWP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP).
UWM and IWP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. IWP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. Both UWM and IWP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UWM or IWP.
Correlation
The correlation between UWM and IWP is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UWM vs. IWP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UWM:
0.42
IWP:
1.73
UWM:
0.87
IWP:
2.34
UWM:
1.10
IWP:
1.30
UWM:
0.36
IWP:
1.61
UWM:
2.04
IWP:
9.00
UWM:
8.57%
IWP:
3.08%
UWM:
41.50%
IWP:
16.05%
UWM:
-88.21%
IWP:
-56.92%
UWM:
-34.86%
IWP:
-6.14%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than IWP's 24.89% return. Over the past 10 years, UWM has underperformed IWP with an annualized return of 6.89%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
UWM
12.61%
-10.75%
17.49%
11.76%
2.21%
6.89%
IWP
24.89%
-0.25%
17.73%
25.84%
11.79%
11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UWM vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.24% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UWM vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UWM vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison
UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than IWP's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.38% | 0.24% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
IWP iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
UWM vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than IWP's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and IWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UWM vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a higher volatility of 12.27% compared to iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) at 6.40%. This indicates that UWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.