ROM vs. SQQQ
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - ROM tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROM returned 41.60%/yr vs -56.05%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
ROM vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 48.47% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -38.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 41.60%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.05% annualized return.
ROM
- 1D
- -4.05%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- 48.47%
- 6M
- 43.07%
- 1Y
- 87.84%
- 3Y*
- 47.89%
- 5Y*
- 24.74%
- 10Y*
- 41.60%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 4.66%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- -38.23%
- 6M
- -35.23%
- 1Y
- -55.90%
- 3Y*
- -53.14%
- 5Y*
- -46.54%
- 10Y*
- -56.05%
ROM vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 48.47% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -38.23% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and SQQQ is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.96 |
The correlation between ROM and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROM vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROM
SQQQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ROM
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
ROM
SQQQ
Energy
ROM
SQQQ
-
Industrials
ROM
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
ROM
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
SQQQ
ROM vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.81 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.91 | +3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | -1.75 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROM vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -100.00% | +16.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -62.10% | +29.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | -92.51% | +44.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | -97.27% | +29.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -99.97% | +32.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.14% | -100.00% | +81.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -92.73% | +71.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.15% | 32.43% | -21.28% |
Volatility
ROM vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is 25.16%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.60%. This indicates that ROM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.16% | 26.60% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.71% | 43.52% | -3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.18% | 53.70% | -6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.55% | 67.55% | -15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.21% | 66.44% | -16.23% |
ROM vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ROM and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
ROM vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SQQQ's 9.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.06% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.67% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROM and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to ROM (25.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 41.60% vs -56.05% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 25.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 41.60% return vs -56.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROM and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.67%, compared with 0.06% for ROM.
ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROM and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer