SQQQ vs. SPXU
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ returned -55.92%/yr vs -41.86%/yr for SPXU. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -41.07% return, which is significantly lower than SPXU's -21.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed SPXU with an annualized return of -55.92%, while SPXU has yielded a comparatively higher -41.86% annualized return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -41.07%
- 6M
- -41.43%
- 1Y
- -62.69%
- 3Y*
- -54.00%
- 5Y*
- -47.88%
- 10Y*
- -55.92%
SPXU
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -21.99%
- 6M
- -22.38%
- 1Y
- -46.46%
- 3Y*
- -40.99%
- 5Y*
- -34.09%
- 10Y*
- -41.86%
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -41.07% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -21.99% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and SPXU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SQQQ and SPXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SQQQ
SPXU
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SQQQ
SPXU
Basic Materials
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Communication Services
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Consumer Cyclical
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Consumer Defensive
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Energy
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Healthcare
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Industrials
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Real Estate
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Technology
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Utilities
SQQQ
-
SPXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
SPXU
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQQQ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.89 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | -1.47 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.99% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.71% | -50.35% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.38% | -84.36% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.23% | -90.23% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -99.63% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -99.99% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | -93.33% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.79% | 30.46% | +6.33% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a higher volatility of 21.95% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) at 12.83%. This indicates that SQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.95% | 12.83% | +9.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.13% | 28.80% | +12.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.45% | 36.78% | +14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.13% | 50.52% | +16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.37% | 53.46% | +12.91% |
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, more than SPXU's 7.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.52% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.59% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SQQQ and SPXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SQQQ has higher volatility (21.95%) compared to SPXU (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs SPXU's -99.99%.
On 10-year performance, SPXU leads with -41.86% vs -55.92% for SQQQ. On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SPXU has been the lower-risk option at 12.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXU has performed better with a -41.86% return vs -55.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.59%, compared with 7.52% for SPXU.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXU is S&P 500. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.90% for SPXU.
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.19 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer