ROBO vs. IGV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology-Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROBO returned 13.65%/yr vs 16.89%/yr for IGV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGV.

Performance

ROBO vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 29.33% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO has underperformed IGV with an annualized return of 13.65%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.89% annualized return.

ROBO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 10.56%
• YTD: 29.33%
• 6M: 30.40%
• 1Y: 59.43%
• 3Y*: 17.13%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 13.65%

IGV

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 13.30%
• YTD: -5.19%
• 6M: -6.07%
• 1Y: -4.56%
• 3Y*: 14.91%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 16.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	29.33%	23.71%	-1.28%	23.74%	-33.92%	15.34%	45.26%	29.51%	-20.92%	44.26%
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET	-5.19%	5.56%	23.41%	58.56%	-35.65%	12.30%	52.86%	34.33%	12.44%	42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and IGV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between ROBO and IGV has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ROBO vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBO	IGV
Industrials	46.8%	0.2%
Technology	41.9%	89.2%
Healthcare	4.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	0.3%
Financial Services	2.2%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Communication Services	1.1%	8.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ROBO vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO

ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 72
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 7
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROBO	IGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	-0.17	+2.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	-0.04	+3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	0.99	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	-0.13	+3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.77	-0.27	+14.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROBO vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROBO	IGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	-0.17	+2.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.25	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.64	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.37	+0.13

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and IGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBO	IGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.65%	-63.45%	+19.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-36.61%	+19.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.92%	-36.61%	+8.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.65%	-45.85%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.65%	-45.85%	+2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-14.93%	+14.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.93%	-14.44%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	17.22%	-12.89%

Volatility

ROBO vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 7.64%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBO	IGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.64%	11.63%	-3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.06%	24.39%	-6.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.01%	27.61%	-4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	27.86%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.16%	26.35%	-3.19%

ROBO vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBO vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	0.33%	0.42%	0.55%	0.05%	0.00%	0.18%	0.20%	0.37%	0.37%	0.02%	0.19%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBO and IGV in my portfolio?

ROBO and IGV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBO or IGV?

IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to ROBO (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs IGV's -63.45%.

Which ETF is better, ROBO or IGV?

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.89% vs 13.65% for ROBO. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBO or IGV?

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.89% return vs 13.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBO or IGV?

IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBO or IGV?

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.

What is the main difference between ROBO and IGV?

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while IGV is Technology Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.46% for IGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.