ROBO vs. AIQ
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO returned 6.41%/yr vs 17.67%/yr for AIQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
ROBO vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 25.02% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 31.91% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 25.02%
- 6M
- 24.43%
- 1Y
- 54.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
AIQ
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 31.91%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 61.99%
- 3Y*
- 34.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 25.02% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -21.68% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 31.91% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and AIQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ROBO and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBO vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBO
AIQ
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ROBO
AIQ
Technology
ROBO
AIQ
Healthcare
ROBO
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
ROBO
AIQ
Financial Services
ROBO
AIQ
Communication Services
ROBO
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
ROBO
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
ROBO
-
AIQ
-
Energy
ROBO
-
AIQ
-
Real Estate
ROBO
-
AIQ
-
Utilities
ROBO
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
AIQ
ROBO vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.78 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 12.25 | -0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -44.66% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -16.47% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -26.35% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -44.66% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -4.35% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -9.78% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 5.08% | -0.48% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 10.76%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 13.84% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.98% | 21.92% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.69% | 25.95% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 25.89% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 25.77% | -2.45% |
ROBO vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO and AIQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to ROBO (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 17.67% vs 6.41% for ROBO. On fees, AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while AIQ is Technology Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer