ROBO vs. BOTZ
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Robotics funds - ROBO tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index while BOTZ tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO returned 6.41%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for BOTZ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 25.02% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 5.80% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 25.02%
- 6M
- 24.43%
- 1Y
- 54.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 25.02% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -20.92% | 44.26% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 5.80% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and BOTZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ROBO and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBO
BOTZ
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ROBO
BOTZ
Technology
ROBO
BOTZ
Healthcare
ROBO
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
ROBO
BOTZ
Financial Services
ROBO
BOTZ
Communication Services
ROBO
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
ROBO
BOTZ
Basic Materials
ROBO
-
BOTZ
Energy
ROBO
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
ROBO
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
ROBO
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
BOTZ
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.39 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 4.50 | +7.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -55.54% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -19.34% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -29.02% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -55.54% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -7.93% | +3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -18.27% | +5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 5.96% | -1.36% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.29%. This indicates that ROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 9.29% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.98% | 19.63% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.69% | 25.19% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 26.96% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 25.80% | -2.48% |
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than BOTZ's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ROBO and BOTZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ROBO has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to BOTZ (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, ROBO leads with 6.41% vs 2.28% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.34% for ROBO.
ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.68% for BOTZ.
ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer