ROBO vs. ARKQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while ARKQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. ROBO is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROBO returned 13.74%/yr vs 22.79%/yr for ARKQ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.

Performance

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 30.34% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 23.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 13.74%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.79% annualized return.

ROBO

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 10.25%
• YTD: 30.34%
• 6M: 33.71%
• 1Y: 61.59%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 13.74%

ARKQ

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 10.14%
• YTD: 23.71%
• 6M: 30.44%
• 1Y: 78.53%
• 3Y*: 40.07%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: 22.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	30.34%	23.71%	-1.28%	23.74%	-33.92%	15.34%	45.26%	29.51%	-20.92%	44.26%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	23.71%	48.81%	33.88%	40.70%	-46.75%	1.74%	107.20%	25.94%	-7.89%	52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and ARKQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.81

The correlation between ROBO and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBO	ARKQ
Industrials	46.8%	37.1%
Technology	41.9%	32.6%
Healthcare	4.9%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	16.9%
Financial Services	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Communication Services	1.1%	8.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

ROBO vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO

ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 76
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 67
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROBO	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.44	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.96	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.37	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	3.83	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	11.62	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROBO	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.44	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.38	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.77	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.67	-0.17

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and ARKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBO	ARKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.65%	-59.89%	+16.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-20.58%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.92%	-30.76%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.65%	-55.71%	+12.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.65%	-59.89%	+16.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.37%	+1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.94%	-17.24%	+4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	6.78%	-2.45%

Volatility

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 7.69%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBO	ARKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.69%	10.16%	-2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.05%	24.37%	-6.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.99%	32.41%	-9.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.64%	32.22%	-8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.16%	29.83%	-6.67%

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBO vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than ARKQ's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	0.32%	0.42%	0.55%	0.05%	0.00%	0.18%	0.20%	0.37%	0.37%	0.02%	0.19%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBO and ARKQ in my portfolio?

ROBO and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBO or ARKQ?

ARKQ has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to ROBO (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

Which ETF is better, ROBO or ARKQ?

On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.79% vs 13.74% for ROBO. On fees, ARKQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 7.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBO or ARKQ?

Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.79% return vs 13.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBO or ARKQ?

ARKQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBO or ARKQ?

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.

What is the main difference between ROBO and ARKQ?

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while ARKQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.75% for ARKQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.