ROBO vs. BOTT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds - ROBO tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index while BOTT tracks the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ROBO returned 28.77% vs 30.32% for BOTT. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BOTT.

Performance

ROBO vs. BOTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than BOTT's -3.52% return.

ROBO

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -4.96%
• 6M: 9.49%
• YTD: 14.34%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 11.42%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: 11.96%
• ALL TIME*: 9.73%

BOTT

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -15.62%
• 6M: -26.88%
• YTD: -3.52%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	$821.19K	$930.14K	$1.58M
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	$10.10M	$12.55M	$20.11M

ROBO vs. BOTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	14.34%	23.71%	6.53%
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	-3.52%	55.56%	10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and BOTT is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.81

The correlation between ROBO and BOTT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. BOTT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBO	BOTT
Industrials	47.1%	40.9%
Technology	41.1%	20.1%
Healthcare	5.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	13.3%
Financial Services	1.5%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Communication Services	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ROBO vs. BOTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROBO

ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 42
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 27
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROBO vs. BOTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBO	BOTT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.68	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.21	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.14	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	0.73	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.75	1.79	+2.96

ROBO vs. BOTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the BOTT Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and BOTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. BOTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than BOTT's maximum drawdown of -38.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and BOTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBO	BOTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.65%	-38.54%	-5.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-38.54%	+21.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.28%	-35.43%	+23.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-8.13%	-4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.85%	15.74%	-9.89%

Volatility

ROBO vs. BOTT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 9.79%, while Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) has a volatility of 14.47%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBO	BOTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.79%	14.47%	-4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.47%	30.87%	-8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.46%	41.62%	-15.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.41%	34.71%	-10.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	34.71%	-11.24%

ROBO vs. BOTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTT's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBO vs. BOTT - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than BOTT's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.14%	0.14%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	0.37%	0.42%	0.55%	0.05%	0.00%	0.18%	0.20%	0.37%	0.37%	0.02%	0.19%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBO and BOTT in my portfolio?

ROBO and BOTT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBO or BOTT?

BOTT has higher volatility (14.47%) compared to ROBO (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs BOTT's -38.54%.

Which ETF is better, ROBO or BOTT?

On 1-year performance, BOTT leads with 30.32% vs 28.77% for ROBO. On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 9.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBO or BOTT?

Over the 1-year period, BOTT has performed better with a 30.32% return vs 28.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBO or BOTT?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBO or BOTT?

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.14% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between ROBO and BOTT?

ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while BOTT tracks Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.35% for BOTT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.