BOTT vs. IBOT

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's -0.29% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and IBOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than IBOT's 2.82% yield.

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, roughly equal to the maximum IBOT drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and IBOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) have volatilities of 7.50% and 7.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.