BOTT vs. IBOT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT).

BOTT and IBOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOTT is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Industrial Robotics & Automation Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Apr 19, 2024. IBOT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BlueStar® Robotics Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2023. Both BOTT and IBOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BOTT vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOTT vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Robotics & Automation ETF	10.26%	55.56%	10.74%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	3.41%	28.57%	3.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than IBOT's 3.41% return.

BOTT

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -18.08%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 83.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBOT

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: -8.78%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 8.50%
• 1Y: 38.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.

IBOT

VanEck Robotics ETF

BOTT

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 88
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 79
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOTT	IBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.52	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.16	+0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	2.33	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	9.18	+0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTT vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and IBOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOTT	IBOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	1.52	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.88	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and IBOT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BOTT vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IBOT's 0.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BOTT Themes Robotics & Automation ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%	0.00%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.37%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and IBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	IBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-25.39%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-16.74%	-14.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.20%	-11.14%	-15.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-5.19%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.84%	4.25%	+4.59%

Volatility

BOTT vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) at 9.23%. This indicates that BOTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	IBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.91%	9.23%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.52%	16.76%	+13.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.67%	25.67%	+12.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.68%	21.81%	+10.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.68%	21.81%	+10.87%