BOTT vs. HUMN

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. BOTT is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. Over the past year, BOTT returned 58.98% vs 34.89% for HUMN. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.

Performance

BOTT vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BOTT having a 11.67% return and HUMN slightly higher at 11.75%.

BOTT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -17.07%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 58.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HUMN

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -13.86%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 34.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	11.67%	42.37%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	11.75%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and HUMN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.80

BOTT vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTT	HUMN
Industrials	42.0%	36.7%
Technology	19.0%	26.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	18.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	6.9%
Communication Services	-	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 45
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTT	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.75	—	—

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-20.40%	-10.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-20.40%	-10.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.26%	-14.26%	-11.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-4.72%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.42%	31.26%	+7.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.66%	31.26%	+2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.66%	31.26%	+2.40%

BOTT vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTT vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than HUMN's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.65%	0.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and HUMN in my portfolio?

BOTT and HUMN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or HUMN?

On 1-year performance, BOTT leads with 58.98% vs 34.89% for HUMN. On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTT or HUMN?

Over the 1-year period, BOTT has performed better with a 58.98% return vs 34.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or HUMN?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or HUMN?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.12% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between BOTT and HUMN?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BOTT and 0.75% for HUMN.