BOTT vs. ARKQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. BOTT is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past year, BOTT returned 68.82% vs 49.50% for ARKQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.

Performance

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 10.20% return.

BOTT

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -11.51%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 19.49%
• 1Y: 68.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARKQ

• 1D: -2.83%
• 1M: -7.26%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 49.50%
• 3Y*: 33.41%
• 5Y*: 8.40%
• 10Y*: 21.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	14.95%	55.56%	10.73%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	10.20%	48.81%	54.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and ARKQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.73

The correlation between BOTT and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTT	ARKQ
Industrials	42.0%	39.3%
Technology	19.0%	33.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	14.3%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	1.6%
Healthcare	-	1.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 48
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTT	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.47	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.99	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.24	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	2.42	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	6.99	-1.36

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and ARKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	ARKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-59.89%	+29.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-20.58%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.07%	-12.14%	-10.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-17.20%	+10.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.25%	7.10%	+5.15%

Volatility

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) have volatilities of 12.52% and 12.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	ARKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.52%	12.96%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.19%	26.26%	+5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.43%	33.93%	+4.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.68%	32.60%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.68%	30.01%	+3.67%

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTT vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ARKQ's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and ARKQ in my portfolio?

BOTT and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTT or ARKQ?

ARKQ has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to BOTT (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTT dropped -30.74% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or ARKQ?

On 1-year performance, BOTT leads with 68.82% vs 49.50% for ARKQ. On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BOTT has been the lower-risk option at 12.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTT or ARKQ?

Over the 1-year period, BOTT has performed better with a 68.82% return vs 49.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or ARKQ?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or ARKQ?

ARKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.12% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between BOTT and ARKQ?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BOTT and 0.75% for ARKQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.