BOTT vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Robotics funds - BOTT tracks the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index while BOTZ tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOTT returned 68.82% vs 20.00% for BOTZ. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.

BOTT

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -11.51%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 19.49%
• 1Y: 68.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -4.41%
• 1M: -9.06%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	14.95%	55.56%	10.73%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	1.13%	14.17%	11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and BOTZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.80

The correlation between BOTT and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTT	BOTZ
Industrials	42.0%	49.3%
Technology	19.0%	31.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	6.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.9%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	8.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 48
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 23
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTT	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	0.79	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.26	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.15	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.04	+1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	3.34	+2.30

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-55.54%	+24.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-19.34%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.07%	-11.99%	-11.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-18.27%	+11.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.25%	6.01%	+6.24%

Volatility

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that BOTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.52%	10.19%	+2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.19%	20.13%	+12.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.43%	25.54%	+12.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.68%	27.03%	+6.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.68%	25.83%	+7.85%

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.65%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and BOTZ in my portfolio?

BOTT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTT or BOTZ?

BOTT has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTT dropped -30.74% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or BOTZ?

On 1-year performance, BOTT leads with 68.82% vs 20.00% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTT or BOTZ?

Over the 1-year period, BOTT has performed better with a 68.82% return vs 20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or BOTZ?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or BOTZ?

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.12% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between BOTT and BOTZ?

BOTT tracks Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BOTT and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.