PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROAD vs. BLCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROAD vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than BLCV's 7.47% return.


ROAD

1D
-0.92%
1M
-11.83%
YTD
1.70%
6M
5.14%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
54.29%
5Y*
27.10%
10Y*

BLCV

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.44%
YTD
7.47%
6M
9.37%
1Y
21.57%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROAD vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ROAD
Construction Partners, Inc.
1.70%22.71%103.26%46.68%
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
7.47%19.96%12.63%15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ROAD and BLCV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROAD vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAD
ROAD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ROAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCV
BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAD vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROADBLCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

2.18

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

8.80

-8.43

ROAD vs. BLCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the BLCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAD and BLCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROADBLCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

1.89

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.47

-0.82

Drawdowns

ROAD vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, which is greater than BLCV's maximum drawdown of -13.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and BLCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROADBLCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.54%

-13.44%

-41.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.55%

-9.92%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

-13.44%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.41%

-0.12%

-21.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.27%

-2.04%

-14.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.83%

2.46%

+11.37%

Volatility

ROAD vs. BLCV - Volatility Comparison

Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) has a higher volatility of 15.65% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) at 2.85%. This indicates that ROAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROADBLCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

2.85%

+12.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.55%

8.79%

+27.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.13%

11.52%

+35.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.40%

12.77%

+32.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.68%

12.77%

+35.91%

Dividends

ROAD vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

ROAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
1.26%1.37%1.63%1.02%
ROAD
Construction Partners, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROAD and BLCV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROAD has higher volatility (15.65%) compared to BLCV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAD dropped -54.54% vs BLCV's -13.44%.

BLCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROAD and BLCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer