ROAD vs. ELF
ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) and ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.) are both stocks. ROAD operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while ELF operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, ROAD returned 33.22%/yr vs 18.00%/yr for ELF. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROAD vs. ELF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -16.91% return.
ROAD
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- 12.57%
- YTD
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 57.69%
- 5Y*
- 33.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ELF
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 19.43%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -20.17%
- 1Y
- -47.28%
- 3Y*
- -16.48%
- 5Y*
- 18.00%
- 10Y*
- —
ROAD vs. ELF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 17.04% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | 1.03% | 72.55% | 91.05% | -32.08% |
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | -16.91% | -39.43% | -13.02% | 161.01% | 66.52% | 31.84% | 56.17% | 86.26% | -54.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROAD and ELF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.26 |
The correlation between ROAD and ELF shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROAD:
$7.15B
ELF:
$3.79B
ROAD:
$2.27
ELF:
$0.44
ROAD:
55.97
ELF:
142.48
ROAD:
1.04
ELF:
3.18
ROAD:
2.18
ELF:
2.29
ROAD:
7.30
ELF:
3.35
ROAD:
$3.26B
ELF:
$1.64B
ROAD:
$511.53M
ELF:
$1.16B
ROAD:
$397.81M
ELF:
$185.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROAD vs. ELF — Risk / Return Rank
ROAD
ELF
ROAD vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROAD | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.90 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | -0.72 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | -1.16 | +2.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROAD vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum ELF drawdown of -77.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and ELF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROAD | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.54% | -77.26% | +22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.55% | -66.20% | +39.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.62% | -77.26% | +43.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.54% | -77.26% | +22.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -71.02% | +61.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.34% | -32.50% | +16.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.40% | 40.67% | -26.27% |
Volatility
ROAD vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is 14.34%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that ROAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROAD | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | 17.68% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.90% | 43.51% | -5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.27% | 67.17% | -18.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.39% | 57.51% | -12.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.80% | 55.30% | -6.50% |
Dividends
ROAD vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROAD nor ELF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ROAD vs. ELF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Construction Partners, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROAD vs. ELF - Profitability Comparison
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
ELF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
ELF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
ELF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROAD and ELF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELF has higher volatility (17.68%) compared to ROAD (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAD dropped -54.54% vs ELF's -77.26%.
ROAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROAD and ELF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer