ROAD vs. ELF

In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a -8.25% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -51.68% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the ELF Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAD and ELF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ROAD nor ELF has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum ELF drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and ELF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is 20.66%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 27.68%. This indicates that ROAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Construction Partners, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.