PortfoliosLab logo
ROAD vs. IESC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ROAD and IESC is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ROAD vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ROAD:

1.68

IESC:

0.93

Sortino Ratio

ROAD:

2.29

IESC:

1.53

Omega Ratio

ROAD:

1.28

IESC:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

ROAD:

2.49

IESC:

0.92

Martin Ratio

ROAD:

5.60

IESC:

2.54

Ulcer Index

ROAD:

14.93%

IESC:

24.99%

Daily Std Dev

ROAD:

50.85%

IESC:

72.41%

Max Drawdown

ROAD:

-54.54%

IESC:

-99.54%

Current Drawdown

ROAD:

-2.15%

IESC:

-33.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROAD:

$5.55B

IESC:

$5.37B

EPS

ROAD:

$1.18

IESC:

$12.33

PE Ratio

ROAD:

85.71

IESC:

21.93

PS Ratio

ROAD:

2.53

IESC:

1.72

PB Ratio

ROAD:

6.87

IESC:

7.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROAD:

$2.19B

IESC:

$3.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROAD:

$315.49M

IESC:

$768.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

ROAD:

$190.05M

IESC:

$368.76M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 34.56% return.


ROAD

YTD

14.33%

1M

30.59%

6M

14.26%

1Y

82.43%

5Y*

45.52%

10Y*

N/A

IESC

YTD

34.56%

1M

47.77%

6M

4.81%

1Y

69.07%

5Y*

63.89%

10Y*

43.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ROAD vs. IESC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROAD is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROAD is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROAD is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROAD is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROAD is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROAD is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IESC is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IESC is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IESC is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IESC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IESC is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IESC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ROAD vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ROAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAD and IESC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ROAD vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROAD nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ROAD vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and IESC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ROAD vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is 13.01%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 20.24%. This indicates that ROAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ROAD vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Construction Partners, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
571.65M
833.96M
(ROAD) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROAD vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Construction Partners, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20212022202320242025
12.5%
25.1%
(ROAD) Gross Margin
(IESC) Gross Margin
ROAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.35M and revenue of 571.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 208.87M and revenue of 833.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

ROAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.29M and revenue of 571.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 92.70M and revenue of 833.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

ROAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 4.22M and revenue of 571.65M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 833.96M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.