PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROAD vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROAD vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 204.59% return.


ROAD

1D
3.48%
1M
12.57%
YTD
17.04%
6M
13.38%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
57.69%
5Y*
33.22%
10Y*

STRL

1D
8.22%
1M
27.26%
YTD
204.59%
6M
197.97%
1Y
327.93%
3Y*
160.79%
5Y*
111.75%
10Y*
68.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROAD vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROAD
Construction Partners, Inc.
17.04%22.71%103.26%63.06%-9.25%1.03%72.55%91.05%-32.08%
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
204.59%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ROAD and STRL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018

0.51

The correlation between ROAD and STRL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROAD:

$7.15B

STRL:

$28.95B

EPS

ROAD:

$2.27

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

ROAD:

55.97

STRL:

83.36

PEG Ratio

ROAD:

1.04

STRL:

1.77

PS Ratio

ROAD:

2.18

STRL:

10.02

PB Ratio

ROAD:

7.30

STRL:

24.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROAD:

$3.26B

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROAD:

$511.53M

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

ROAD:

$397.81M

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROAD vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAD
ROAD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ROAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAD vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROADSTRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.54

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

10.65

-9.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

28.84

-27.16

ROAD vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAD and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROAD vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROADSTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.54%

-92.51%

+37.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.55%

-31.02%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

-47.67%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.54%

-47.67%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.56%

-6.14%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-46.26%

+29.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.40%

11.44%

+2.96%

Volatility

ROAD vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is 14.34%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 25.27%. This indicates that ROAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROADSTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

25.27%

-10.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.90%

63.92%

-26.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.27%

82.74%

-34.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.39%

57.39%

-12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.80%

53.64%

-4.84%

Dividends

ROAD vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROAD nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ROAD vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Construction Partners, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
769.20M
825.68M
(ROAD) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROAD vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Construction Partners, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
12.9%
23.5%
Portfolio components
ROAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

ROAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

ROAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROAD and STRL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (25.27%) compared to ROAD (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAD dropped -54.54% vs STRL's -92.51%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROAD and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer