ROAD vs. ARHS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS).

Performance

ROAD vs. ARHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROAD vs. ARHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc.	2.37%	22.71%	103.26%	63.06%	-9.25%	-27.47%
ARHS Arhaus, Inc.	-36.54%	19.26%	-17.91%	21.54%	-26.42%	3.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ROAD : $6.23B ARHS : $958.78M
EPS ROAD : $2.19 ARHS : $0.48
PE Ratio ROAD : 50.85 ARHS : 14.26
PEG Ratio ROAD : 0.94 ARHS : 0.27
PS Ratio ROAD : 2.03 ARHS : 0.70
PB Ratio ROAD : 6.43 ARHS : 2.29
Total Revenue (TTM) ROAD : $3.06B ARHS : $1.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) ROAD : $484.02M ARHS : $535.87M
EBITDA (TTM) ROAD : $381.90M ARHS : $158.18M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than ARHS's -36.54% return.

ROAD

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: -17.30%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: -12.50%
• 1Y: 54.61%
• 3Y*: 60.37%
• 5Y*: 30.07%
• 10Y*: —

ARHS

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -13.77%
• YTD: -36.54%
• 6M: -33.07%
• 1Y: -18.23%
• 3Y*: -3.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ROAD vs. ARHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAD

ROAD Risk / Return Rank: 76
ROAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ROAD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ROAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ROAD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ARHS

ARHS Risk / Return Rank: 28
ARHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ARHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ARHS Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ARHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
ARHS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAD vs. ARHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROAD	ARHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	-0.30	+1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	-0.05	+1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.99	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	-0.36	+2.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	-0.88	+5.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROAD vs. ARHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the ARHS Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAD and ARHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROAD	ARHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	-0.30	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	-0.19	+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between ROAD and ARHS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ROAD vs. ARHS - Dividend Comparison

ROAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.

	TTM	2025	2024
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ARHS Arhaus, Inc.	5.16%	0.00%	5.32%

Drawdowns

ROAD vs. ARHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum ARHS drawdown of -67.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and ARHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROAD	ARHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.54%	-67.08%	+12.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.55%	-46.72%	+20.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.99%	-63.85%	+43.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.31%	-37.75%	+21.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.27%	19.25%	-6.98%

Volatility

ROAD vs. ARHS - Volatility Comparison

Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) has a higher volatility of 17.72% compared to Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) at 12.02%. This indicates that ROAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROAD	ARHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.72%	12.02%	+5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.01%	35.27%	-4.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.05%	60.14%	-14.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.24%	63.02%	-18.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.43%	63.02%	-14.59%

Financials

ROAD vs. ARHS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Construction Partners, Inc. and Arhaus, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ROAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.50M and revenue of 809.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.0%.

ARHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.17M and revenue of 364.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

ROAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.41M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

ARHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.27M and revenue of 364.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

ROAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 17.21M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

ARHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported a net income of 15.09M and revenue of 364.85M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.