BLCV vs. VTV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. BLCV is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BLCV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

BLCV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLCV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

VTV

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 11.27%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 12.57%
• ALL TIME*: 9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$688.19M	$688.42M	$619.05M

BLCV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	6.47%	19.96%	12.63%	14.56%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.37%	15.27%	15.95%	10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and VTV is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023	0.90

The correlation between BLCV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLCV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLCV	VTV
Technology	17.8%	15.3%
Financial Services	16.5%	22.4%
Healthcare	14.4%	15.2%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	3.9%
Industrials	10.6%	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	8.7%
Energy	5.4%	6.9%
Communication Services	4.9%	2.9%
Utilities	4.3%	4.8%
Real Estate	2.6%	2.5%
Basic Materials	2.3%	3.0%

Return for Risk

BLCV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLCV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCV	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.62	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.42	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCV	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.27%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.35%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.36%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.82%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLCV	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	10.36%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.82%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.61%	—

BLCV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.01%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCV and VTV in my portfolio?

BLCV and VTV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLCV or VTV?

On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCV or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCV or VTV?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.01% for BLCV.

What is the main difference between BLCV and VTV?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BLCV and 0.04% for VTV.