PortfoliosLab logo
BLCV vs. IWB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and IWB is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

BLCV vs. IWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLCV:

0.46

IWB:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

BLCV:

0.58

IWB:

0.87

Omega Ratio

BLCV:

1.08

IWB:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

BLCV:

0.39

IWB:

0.54

Martin Ratio

BLCV:

1.46

IWB:

2.05

Ulcer Index

BLCV:

3.58%

IWB:

5.07%

Daily Std Dev

BLCV:

15.66%

IWB:

19.73%

Max Drawdown

BLCV:

-13.44%

IWB:

-55.38%

Current Drawdown

BLCV:

-2.75%

IWB:

-5.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's -0.90% return.


BLCV

YTD

3.78%

1M

3.64%

6M

-1.75%

1Y

6.64%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IWB

YTD

-0.90%

1M

6.03%

6M

-2.64%

1Y

10.92%

3Y*

15.25%

5Y*

15.80%

10Y*

12.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

BLCV vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLCV vs. IWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLCV is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLCV is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLCV is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLCV is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLCV is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLCV is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWB is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWB is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWB is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWB is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWB is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWB is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLCV vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the IWB Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCV and IWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BLCV vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison

BLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than IWB's 1.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.63%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
1.14%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%1.71%

Drawdowns

BLCV vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and IWB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BLCV vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) is 3.65%, while iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that BLCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...