RNGR vs. COR
RNGR (Ranger Energy Services, Inc.) and COR (Cencora Inc.) are both stocks. RNGR operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while COR operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, RNGR returned 16.00%/yr vs 22.35%/yr for COR. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RNGR vs. COR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNGR achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -7.45% return.
RNGR
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 28.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.13%
COR
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- 6M
- -12.98%
- YTD
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
COR Cencora Inc. | $329.96M | $414.84M | $493.78M |
| $3.55M | $3.42M | $3.44M |
RNGR vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 15.65% | -7.94% | 53.89% | -6.26% | 7.21% | 182.14% | -43.48% | 24.56% | -43.99% | -34.07% |
COR Cencora Inc. | -7.45% | 51.48% | 10.37% | 25.33% | 26.26% | 44.09% | 23.37% | 23.51% | -17.57% | 17.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNGR and COR is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2017 | 0.06 |
The correlation between RNGR and COR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RNGR:
$375.60M
COR:
$60.57B
RNGR:
$0.61
COR:
$13.08
RNGR:
26.19
COR:
23.80
RNGR:
3.74
COR:
11.31
RNGR:
0.62
COR:
0.18
RNGR:
1.27
COR:
17.90
RNGR:
$606.70M
COR:
$328.68B
RNGR:
$20.10M
COR:
$11.66B
RNGR:
$80.60M
COR:
$3.64B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNGR vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank
RNGR
COR
RNGR vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNGR | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.10 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.30 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 0.70 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNGR vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNGR drawdown since its inception was -85.16%, which is greater than COR's maximum drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNGR and COR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNGR | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.16% | -71.01% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.86% | -32.44% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.52% | -32.44% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.52% | -32.44% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -16.59% | +4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -13.65% | -25.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.06% | 13.81% | -5.75% |
Volatility
RNGR vs. COR - Volatility Comparison
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) has a higher volatility of 11.86% compared to Cencora Inc. (COR) at 7.69%. This indicates that RNGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNGR | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.86% | 7.69% | +4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 27.97% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.33% | 30.97% | +5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.93% | 22.50% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.94% | 27.56% | +27.38% |
Dividends
RNGR vs. COR - Dividend Comparison
RNGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than COR's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COR Cencora Inc. | 0.75% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 1.13% | 5.13% | 6.74% | 7.48% | 2.07% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.29% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RNGR vs. COR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ranger Energy Services, Inc. and Cencora Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RNGR vs. COR - Profitability Comparison
RNGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -12.30M and revenue of 176.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.0%.
COR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.
RNGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.40M and revenue of 176.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
COR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.
RNGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ranger Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 6.90M and revenue of 176.50M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
COR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RNGR and COR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNGR has higher volatility (11.86%) compared to COR (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNGR dropped -85.16% vs COR's -71.01%.
RNGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNGR and COR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer