PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RKSG vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RKSG vs. QUS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

RKSG (Ruk Strategic Growth ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RKSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Ruk Strategic Growth Index, while QUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RKSG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.

Performance

RKSG vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

RKSG

1D
1.30%
1M
3.51%
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

QUS

1D
1.40%
1M
2.71%
6M
9.58%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
13.70%
ALL TIME*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

QUS

State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
$3.23M$4.78M$3.45M

RKSG

Ruk Strategic Growth ETF
$31.32K$31.13K$35.98K

RKSG vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
RKSG
Ruk Strategic Growth ETF		14.25%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF		12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between RKSG and QUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026

0.79

RKSG vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RKSG
QUS

Technology

34.2%
28.4%

Healthcare

17.4%
14.4%

Financial Services

12.2%
15.7%

Industrials

10.1%
8.1%

Communication Services

7.9%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
5.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
8.3%

Utilities

1.6%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.6%

Technology

RKSG
34.2%
QUS
28.4%

Healthcare

RKSG
17.4%
QUS
14.4%

Financial Services

RKSG
12.2%
QUS
15.7%

Industrials

RKSG
10.1%
QUS
8.1%

Communication Services

RKSG
7.9%
QUS
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RKSG
5.3%
QUS
5.7%

Energy

RKSG
4.0%
QUS
3.3%

Basic Materials

RKSG
2.7%
QUS
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

RKSG
2.6%
QUS
8.3%

Utilities

RKSG
1.6%
QUS
3.9%

Real Estate

RKSG
1.1%
QUS
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ruk Strategic Growth ETF

State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

Often compared with RKSG:
RKSG vs. SPITRKSG vs. CCORRKSG vs. DARPRKSG vs. DGRORKSG vs. GARYRKSG vs. ILCBRKSG vs. HLAL
Often compared with QUS:
QUS vs. IVVQUS vs. QUALQUS vs. JQUAQUS vs. SPYQUS vs. VOOQUS vs. DGTQUS vs. BERZ

Return for Risk

RKSG vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
RKSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RKSG vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RKSGQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.17

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

3.07

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.39

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.92

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

13.04

—

RKSG vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKSG vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and QUS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RKSGQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-33.78%

+28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-6.85%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-13.94%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-22.30%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.78%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-3.66%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.53%

—

Volatility

RKSG vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RKSGQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

2.76%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

7.08%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

9.29%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.58%

14.34%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.58%

16.40%

-4.82%

RKSG vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKSG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

RKSG vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF		1.25%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%
RKSG
Ruk Strategic Growth ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RKSG and QUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RKSG.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.

RKSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. RKSG tracks Ruk Strategic Growth Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Ruk and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RKSG and 0.15% for QUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKSG and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer