QUS vs. SPY
QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD), while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUS returned 13.72%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
QUS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, QUS has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 13.72%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
QUS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
QUS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.05% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUS and SPY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QUS and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUS vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUS
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUS
SPY
Financial Services
QUS
SPY
Healthcare
QUS
SPY
Communication Services
QUS
SPY
Consumer Defensive
QUS
SPY
Industrials
QUS
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
QUS
SPY
Energy
QUS
SPY
Utilities
QUS
SPY
Basic Materials
QUS
SPY
Real Estate
QUS
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
QUS
SPY
QUS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.01 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 13.54 | -1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -55.19% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -8.88% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.94% | -18.76% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.30% | -24.50% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.78% | -33.72% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -1.75% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -9.04% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 1.97% | -0.43% |
Volatility
QUS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 2.83%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 4.64% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.98% | 9.75% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.25% | 12.43% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 17.14% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 17.99% | -1.55% |
QUS vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUS and SPY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to QUS (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUS dropped -33.78% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 13.72% for QUS. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
QUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUS and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer