PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUS vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUS vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.93% return.


QUS

1D
0.33%
1M
0.45%
6M
7.38%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
13.56%
ALL TIME*
12.68%

JQUA

1D
0.08%
1M
0.33%
6M
13.64%
YTD
14.93%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.79M$28.22M$36.46M
$2.96M$4.90M$3.46M

QUS vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
9.32%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%4.05%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
14.93%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QUS and JQUA is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.90

The correlation between QUS and JQUA shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QUS vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUS
JQUA

Technology

28.4%
41.0%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.0%

Healthcare

14.4%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
5.2%

Communication Services

8.2%
6.2%

Industrials

8.1%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.5%

Utilities

3.9%
1.2%

Energy

3.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.2%

Technology

QUS
28.4%
JQUA
41.0%

Financial Services

QUS
15.7%
JQUA
12.0%

Healthcare

QUS
14.4%
JQUA
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

QUS
8.3%
JQUA
5.2%

Communication Services

QUS
8.2%
JQUA
6.2%

Industrials

QUS
8.1%
JQUA
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QUS
5.7%
JQUA
9.5%

Utilities

QUS
3.9%
JQUA
1.2%

Energy

QUS
3.3%
JQUA
3.3%

Basic Materials

QUS
2.2%
JQUA
1.7%

Real Estate

QUS
1.6%
JQUA
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUS vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUS vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUSJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.95

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

12.05

-0.47

QUS vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUS and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUS vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, roughly equal to the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUSJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-32.92%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-7.13%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-16.81%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

-22.47%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.36%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-4.10%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.74%

-0.21%

Volatility

QUS vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) have volatilities of 2.37% and 2.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUSJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

2.34%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

9.47%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

12.04%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

15.72%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

17.93%

-1.54%

QUS vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUS vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than JQUA's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.08%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.28%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUS and JQUA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUS has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to JQUA (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUS dropped -33.78% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.89% vs 10.75% for QUS. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.08% for JQUA.

QUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while JQUA is Quality Factor. QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD), while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.12% for JQUA.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUS and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer