HLAL vs. UMMA
Compare and contrast key facts about Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA).
HLAL and UMMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HLAL is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the FTSE Shariah USA Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2019. UMMA is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2022. Both HLAL and UMMA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HLAL or UMMA.
Key characteristics
| HLAL | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.32% | 9.10% |
| 1Y Return | 25.42% | 16.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.03 | 1.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.30% | 15.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.57% | -34.17% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and UMMA is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HLAL vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 9.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLAL vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HLAL vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HLAL vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than UMMA's 0.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.54% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and UMMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HLAL vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) is 3.94%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that HLAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.