PortfoliosLab logo
HLAL vs. AMAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HLAL and AMAGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HLAL:

0.32

AMAGX:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

HLAL:

0.48

AMAGX:

0.37

Omega Ratio

HLAL:

1.07

AMAGX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

HLAL:

0.22

AMAGX:

0.15

Martin Ratio

HLAL:

0.76

AMAGX:

0.52

Ulcer Index

HLAL:

6.29%

AMAGX:

6.38%

Daily Std Dev

HLAL:

20.78%

AMAGX:

21.52%

Max Drawdown

HLAL:

-33.57%

AMAGX:

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

HLAL:

-6.78%

AMAGX:

-4.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than AMAGX's -0.67% return.


HLAL

YTD

-2.98%

1M

5.82%

6M

-3.76%

1Y

6.61%

3Y*

10.70%

5Y*

15.42%

10Y*

N/A

AMAGX

YTD

-0.67%

1M

7.21%

6M

-2.16%

1Y

5.72%

3Y*

12.25%

5Y*

14.86%

10Y*

14.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HLAL vs. AMAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HLAL is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HLAL is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HLAL is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HLAL is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HLAL is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HLAL is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HLAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLAL and AMAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than AMAGX's 3.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.69%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMAGX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund
3.98%3.95%0.65%3.64%0.52%5.44%3.15%3.47%10.90%13.67%7.45%6.51%

Drawdowns

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and AMAGX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) at 5.07%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...