HLAL vs. AMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX).
HLAL is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the FTSE Shariah USA Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2019. AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994.
Performance
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | -3.31% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 7.97% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HLAL having a -3.31% return and AMAGX slightly higher at -3.22%.
HLAL
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 22.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
AMAGX
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLAL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.78 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.08 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 8.67 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLAL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.59 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.65 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and AMAGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and AMAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -57.64% | +24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | -11.84% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -28.09% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -7.87% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -10.32% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.84% | +0.05% |
Volatility
HLAL vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) is 5.86%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that HLAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 7.18% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 12.50% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.53% | 20.42% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 18.24% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 18.31% | +2.02% |