HLAL vs. AMAGX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) and AMAGX (Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HLAL is passively managed, while AMAGX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLAL returned 13.34%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for AMAGX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HLAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for AMAGX.

Performance

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's 11.50% return.

HLAL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: 10.76%
• YTD: 12.86%
• 1Y: 30.01%
• 3Y*: 17.36%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.69%

AMAGX

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -1.51%
• 6M: 8.84%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 16.64%
• ALL TIME*: 12.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	$3.42M	$3.57M	$4.40M

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	12.86%	18.30%	16.70%	30.13%	-17.56%	28.64%	24.65%	10.61%
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	11.50%	17.62%	15.73%	25.67%	-19.49%	31.51%	32.93%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HLAL and AMAGX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019	0.91

The correlation between HLAL and AMAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HLAL vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 79
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

AMAGX

AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 54
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HLAL	AMAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.29	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.85	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	2.04	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.11	7.75	+2.36

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLAL and AMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and AMAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLAL	AMAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-57.64%	+24.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.20%	-11.04%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.67%	-21.45%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.18%	-28.09%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.00%	-5.03%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-10.24%	+5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	2.91%	-0.14%

Volatility

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) at 4.60%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLAL	AMAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	4.60%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	14.13%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	17.54%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	18.65%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.23%	18.50%	+1.73%

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLAL vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	0.00%	0.00%	3.95%	0.65%	3.64%	0.52%	5.44%	3.15%	3.47%	10.90%	13.67%	7.45%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.46%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLAL and AMAGX in my portfolio?

HLAL and AMAGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLAL or AMAGX?

HLAL has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to AMAGX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.