GARY vs. CHGX
GARY (Mango Growth ETF) and CHGX (Stance Sustainable Beta ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GARY is actively managed, while CHGX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GARY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CHGX.
Performance
GARY vs. CHGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 25.69% return, which is significantly higher than CHGX's 19.57% return.
GARY
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- YTD
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CHGX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $397.74K | $582.66K | $623.16K | |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | $600.48K | $395.06K | $299.75K |
GARY vs. CHGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 25.69% | 0.15% |
CHGX Stance Sustainable Beta ETF | 19.57% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARY and CHGX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARY vs. CHGX — Risk / Return Rank
GARY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHGX
GARY vs. CHGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Stance Sustainable Beta ETF (CHGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARY | CHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARY vs. CHGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum CHGX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and CHGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARY | CHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -35.49% | +22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -3.00% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -6.36% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility
GARY vs. CHGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARY | CHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 14.75% | +7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 17.71% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 19.30% | +3.04% |
GARY vs. CHGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CHGX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARY vs. CHGX - Dividend Comparison
GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than CHGX's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Stance Sustainable Beta ETF | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY and CHGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHGX is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHGX is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
CHGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: Mango and Stance. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.49% for CHGX.
Find the right allocation for GARY and CHGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer