GARY vs. HYP
GARY (Mango Growth ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GARY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.
Performance
GARY vs. HYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GARY having a 30.72% return and HYP slightly higher at 31.33%.
GARY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYP
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 8.44%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARY vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 30.72% | 0.25% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 31.33% | -4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARY and HYP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARY vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARY | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.42 | 0.92 | +3.50 |
Drawdowns
GARY vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum HYP drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and HYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARY | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -19.58% | +9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -2.27% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -6.45% | +4.76% |
Volatility
GARY vs. HYP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARY | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 41.01% | -21.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 41.01% | -21.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 41.01% | -21.76% |
GARY vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARY vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison
GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than HYP's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY and HYP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: Mango and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.85% for HYP.
Find the right allocation for GARY and HYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer