RING vs. SSRM
RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RING returned 13.85%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for SSRM. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RING vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 24.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 13.85%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
RING
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -16.79%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 44.87%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
SSRM
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -21.64%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 119.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
RING vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | -5.54% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 24.22% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between RING and SSRM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.80 |
The correlation between RING and SSRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RING vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
RING
SSRM
RING vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RING | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 3.83 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 9.89 | -5.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RING vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RING | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -91.68% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.72% | -31.28% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.72% | -73.41% | +37.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.94% | -83.16% | +35.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.04% | -83.16% | +31.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.03% | -37.45% | +7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -57.15% | +9.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 12.09% | +0.65% |
Volatility
RING vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 16.83%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 19.31%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RING | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.83% | 19.31% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.11% | 54.27% | -15.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.31% | 66.63% | -19.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.81% | 55.93% | -19.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 52.96% | -16.26% |
Dividends
RING vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.89% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RING and SSRM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSRM has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to RING (16.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RING and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer