RING vs. AUMI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI).
RING and AUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. Both RING and AUMI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RING vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RING vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 12.19% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 2.89% |
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 10.53% | 164.18% | 30.61% | 4.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than AUMI's 10.53% return.
RING
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -16.59%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 26.66%
- 1Y
- 117.81%
- 3Y*
- 50.83%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
AUMI
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -16.46%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- 1Y
- 116.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RING vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RING vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank
RING
AUMI
RING vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RING | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 2.35 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 2.57 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.66 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 12.93 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RING | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.35 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 2.01 | -1.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between RING and AUMI is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RING vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison
RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than AUMI's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.75% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RING vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than AUMI's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and AUMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RING | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -31.88% | -47.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.11% | -31.88% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.90% | -16.84% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.74% | -6.00% | -41.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.45% | 9.03% | -0.58% |
Volatility
RING vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 16.89%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 18.77%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RING | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 18.77% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.80% | 40.65% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.82% | 49.65% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.87% | 41.38% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 41.38% | -4.51% |