RING vs. AUMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) and AUMI (Themes Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds - RING tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index while AUMI tracks the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RING returned 52.30% vs 42.36% for AUMI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RING charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AUMI.

Performance

RING vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly higher than AUMI's -13.29% return.

RING

• 1D: -4.54%
• 1M: -9.24%
• YTD: -8.53%
• 6M: -13.08%
• 1Y: 52.30%
• 3Y*: 44.79%
• 5Y*: 20.81%
• 10Y*: 12.92%

AUMI

• 1D: -4.42%
• 1M: -8.75%
• YTD: -13.29%
• 6M: -17.30%
• 1Y: 42.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-8.53%	164.72%	15.98%	9.55%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	-13.29%	164.18%	30.61%	10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RING and AUMI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.92

The correlation between RING and AUMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

RING vs. AUMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RING	AUMI
Basic Materials	99.7%	99.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RING vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 30
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 32
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 29

AUMI

AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 25
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RING	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.85	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	1.32	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.08	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	2.97	+0.94

RING vs. AUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the AUMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and AUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RING vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than AUMI's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and AUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RING	AUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.47%	-39.28%	-40.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.72%	-39.28%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.25%	-34.76%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.33%	-7.57%	-39.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.40%	14.30%	-0.90%

Volatility

RING vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 17.22%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RING	AUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.22%	18.19%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.95%	41.34%	-1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.04%	50.13%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.94%	42.46%	-5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.73%	42.46%	-5.73%

RING vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RING vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than AUMI's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	1.00%	0.86%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	1.35%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RING and AUMI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, RING and AUMI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RING or AUMI?

AUMI has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to RING (17.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs AUMI's -39.28%.

Which ETF is better, RING or AUMI?

On 1-year performance, RING leads with 52.30% vs 42.36% for AUMI. On fees, AUMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 17.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RING or AUMI?

Over the 1-year period, RING has performed better with a 52.30% return vs 42.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RING or AUMI?

AUMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RING or AUMI?

RING has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.00% for AUMI.

What is the main difference between RING and AUMI?

RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while AUMI tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RING and 0.35% for AUMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.