PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RING vs. SLVP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RING and SLVP is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

RING vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.40%
-29.85%
RING
SLVP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RING:

1.72

SLVP:

1.20

Sortino Ratio

RING:

2.23

SLVP:

1.83

Omega Ratio

RING:

1.29

SLVP:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

RING:

1.26

SLVP:

0.90

Martin Ratio

RING:

5.83

SLVP:

4.07

Ulcer Index

RING:

9.22%

SLVP:

11.73%

Daily Std Dev

RING:

31.19%

SLVP:

39.67%

Max Drawdown

RING:

-79.48%

SLVP:

-80.47%

Current Drawdown

RING:

-13.04%

SLVP:

-32.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a 36.36% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's 28.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 10.96%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.46% annualized return.


RING

YTD

36.36%

1M

16.36%

6M

14.70%

1Y

51.61%

5Y*

14.97%

10Y*

10.96%

SLVP

YTD

28.77%

1M

13.78%

6M

11.65%

1Y

44.01%

5Y*

15.01%

10Y*

7.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RING vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RING and SLVP have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Expense ratio chart for RING: current value is 0.39%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RING: 0.39%
Expense ratio chart for SLVP: current value is 0.39%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SLVP: 0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RING vs. SLVP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RING is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RING is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RING is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RING is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RING is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RING is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLVP is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLVP is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLVP is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLVP is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLVP is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLVP is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RING vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
RING: 1.72
SLVP: 1.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for RING, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
RING: 2.23
SLVP: 1.83
The chart of Omega ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
RING: 1.29
SLVP: 1.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
RING: 1.26
SLVP: 0.90
The chart of Martin ratio for RING, currently valued at 5.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00
RING: 5.83
SLVP: 4.07

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and SLVP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.72
1.20
RING
SLVP

Dividends

RING vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than SLVP's 0.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
1.05%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.82%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.42%0.97%0.85%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
0.81%1.05%0.87%0.64%1.62%2.39%2.02%1.27%0.85%2.32%0.71%2.03%

Drawdowns

RING vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and SLVP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.04%
-32.03%
RING
SLVP

Volatility

RING vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 7.87%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 11.56%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.87%
11.56%
RING
SLVP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab