RING vs. FGDL
RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both Gold funds - RING tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index while FGDL tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RING returned 47.05%/yr vs 29.60%/yr for FGDL. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RING charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.
Performance
RING vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's -3.06% return.
RING
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 6M
- -8.91%
- 1Y
- 61.98%
- 3Y*
- 47.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
FGDL
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- 23.95%
- 3Y*
- 29.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RING vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | -4.18% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | 0.42% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | -3.06% | 64.15% | 27.31% | 12.92% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RING and FGDL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RING and FGDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RING vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank
RING
FGDL
RING vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RING | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 0.97 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 2.63 | +2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RING vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -24.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and FGDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RING | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -24.73% | -54.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.72% | -24.73% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.72% | -24.73% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.02% | -22.54% | -6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.34% | -4.05% | -43.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.25% | 9.11% | +4.14% |
Volatility
RING vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a higher volatility of 16.66% compared to Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) at 8.36%. This indicates that RING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RING | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.66% | 8.36% | +8.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.68% | 24.41% | +15.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.90% | 27.82% | +20.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.89% | 19.31% | +17.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 19.31% | +17.43% |
RING vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RING vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison
RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 1.29% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RING and FGDL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RING has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to FGDL (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs FGDL's -24.73%.
On 3-year performance, RING leads with 47.05% vs 29.60% for FGDL. On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FGDL has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RING has performed better with a 47.05% return vs 29.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.
RING has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.
RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RING and 0.15% for FGDL.
RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RING and FGDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer