PortfoliosLab logo
RING vs. GOLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RING and GOLD is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

RING vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-3.89%
-50.28%
RING
GOLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RING:

1.81

GOLD:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

RING:

2.33

GOLD:

1.05

Omega Ratio

RING:

1.31

GOLD:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

RING:

1.51

GOLD:

0.32

Martin Ratio

RING:

6.68

GOLD:

1.66

Ulcer Index

RING:

9.27%

GOLD:

12.54%

Daily Std Dev

RING:

34.19%

GOLD:

34.76%

Max Drawdown

RING:

-79.48%

GOLD:

-88.51%

Current Drawdown

RING:

-5.67%

GOLD:

-55.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a 47.92% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 25.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed GOLD with an annualized return of 11.28%, while GOLD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.22% annualized return.


RING

YTD

47.92%

1M

10.70%

6M

21.12%

1Y

59.37%

5Y*

9.61%

10Y*

11.28%

GOLD

YTD

25.93%

1M

0.31%

6M

-3.39%

1Y

20.12%

5Y*

-3.87%

10Y*

6.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RING vs. GOLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RING is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RING is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RING is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RING is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RING is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RING is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOLD is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOLD is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOLD is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOLD is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RING vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RING: 1.81
GOLD: 0.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for RING, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RING: 2.33
GOLD: 1.05
The chart of Omega ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
RING: 1.31
GOLD: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RING: 1.51
GOLD: 0.34
The chart of Martin ratio for RING, currently valued at 6.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
RING: 6.68
GOLD: 1.66

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the GOLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and GOLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.81
0.60
RING
GOLD

Dividends

RING vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than GOLD's 2.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
0.97%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.82%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.42%0.97%0.85%
GOLD
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.06%2.58%2.21%3.78%4.11%1.36%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%1.86%

Drawdowns

RING vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, smaller than the maximum GOLD drawdown of -88.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and GOLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.67%
-50.28%
RING
GOLD

Volatility

RING vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) have volatilities of 16.07% and 15.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.07%
15.89%
RING
GOLD