RING vs. BLOK

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify. RING is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RING returned 18.76%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for BLOK. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RING charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.

Performance

RING vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 12.57% return.

RING

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -16.79%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 56.55%
• 3Y*: 44.87%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

BLOK

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 24.42%
• 3Y*: 50.68%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-5.54%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-17.69%
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	12.57%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	30.76%	90.17%	29.54%	-25.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RING and BLOK is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018	0.22

The correlation between RING and BLOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RING vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RING	BLOK
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	55.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	31.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RING vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 36
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RING	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.63	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.08	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.13	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	0.69	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	1.49	+2.96

RING vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RING vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and BLOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RING	BLOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.47%	-73.33%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.72%	-35.64%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.72%	-35.64%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.94%	-73.33%	+25.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.03%	-12.97%	-17.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.36%	-26.03%	-21.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.74%	16.41%	-3.67%

Volatility

RING vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) at 13.34%. This indicates that RING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RING	BLOK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.83%	13.34%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.11%	30.02%	+9.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.31%	39.18%	+8.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.81%	42.53%	-5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.70%	39.05%	-2.35%

RING vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

RING vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than BLOK's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.64%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.89%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RING and BLOK in my portfolio?

RING and BLOK have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RING or BLOK?

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to BLOK (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

Which ETF is better, RING or BLOK?

On 5-year performance, RING leads with 18.76% vs 11.50% for BLOK. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 13.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RING or BLOK?

Over the 5-year period, RING has performed better with a 18.76% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RING or BLOK?

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RING or BLOK?

RING has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.64% for BLOK.

What is the main difference between RING and BLOK?

RING is categorized as Gold, while BLOK is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RING and 0.70% for BLOK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.