RFDA vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
RFDA and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
RFDA vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFDA vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | -1.05% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.36% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 2.36% return.
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFDA vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
RFDA
NOBL
RFDA vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFDA | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.40 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 0.68 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.66 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 2.36 | +6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFDA | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.40 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.44 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.64 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and NOBL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFDA vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than NOBL's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.99% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and NOBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFDA | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -35.43% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -11.20% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -17.92% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -7.04% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -3.45% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.15% | -0.66% |
Volatility
RFDA vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.61%. This indicates that RFDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFDA | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.61% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 8.07% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 15.29% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.40% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.60% | +0.33% |