PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RFDA vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RFDA vs. MEME

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RFDA charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

RFDA vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 31.77% return.

RFDA

1D
0.83%
1M
3.31%
6M
14.27%
YTD
15.99%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
13.43%
ALL TIME*
13.55%

MEME

1D
7.78%
1M
-2.62%
6M
9.37%
YTD
31.77%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

MEME

Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
$1.70M$1.38M$2.07M

RFDA

RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
$111.59K$107.70K$119.19K

RFDA vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF		15.99%1.31%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		31.77%-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and MEME is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.39

RFDA vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RFDA
MEME

Financial Services

18.8%
5.4%

Technology

15.4%
81.9%

Healthcare

12.2%
6.2%

Energy

11.1%
4.8%

Industrials

9.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Communication Services

6.2%
5.5%

Real Estate

5.1%

-

Utilities

4.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.6%

Financial Services

RFDA
18.8%
MEME
5.4%

Technology

RFDA
15.4%
MEME
81.9%

Healthcare

RFDA
12.2%
MEME
6.2%

Energy

RFDA
11.1%
MEME
4.8%

Industrials

RFDA
9.3%
MEME
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RFDA
8.1%
MEME
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

RFDA
7.1%
MEME

-

Communication Services

RFDA
6.2%
MEME
5.5%

Real Estate

RFDA
5.1%
MEME

-

Utilities

RFDA
4.9%
MEME
4.9%

Basic Materials

RFDA
1.8%
MEME
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF

Roundhill Meme Stock ETF

Often compared with RFDA:
RFDA vs. DGRORFDA vs. DIVBRFDA vs. BWXRFDA vs. AGGRFDA vs. SCHDRFDA vs. HYGRFDA vs. IAU
Often compared with MEME:
MEME vs. AFLGMEME vs. ANEWMEME vs. IWFMEME vs. BCHPMEME vs. URAMEME vs. BELTMEME vs. TMFC

Return for Risk

RFDA vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFDA vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RFDAMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.31

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.16

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

—

—

RFDA vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -50.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and MEME.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RFDAMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-50.08%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.76%

+30.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-29.30%

+25.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

—

—

Volatility

RFDA vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RFDAMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

79.62%

-67.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

79.62%

-63.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

79.62%

-62.78%

RFDA vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFDA vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF		1.74%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

RFDA and MEME have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for RFDA and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDA and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer