REXC vs. XES
REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REXC is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while XES is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REXC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XES.
Performance
REXC vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REXC
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XES
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- 39.22%
- 6M
- 40.00%
- 1Y
- 79.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
REXC vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 0.74% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between REXC and XES is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REXC vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
REXC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XES
REXC vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REXC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REXC vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REXC drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXC and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REXC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -95.65% | +74.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.80% | -73.11% | +59.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -54.40% | +47.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
REXC vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REXC | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.79% | 31.19% | +22.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.79% | 39.02% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.79% | 44.96% | +8.83% |
REXC vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison
REXC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
REXC vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.15% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REXC and XES have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for REXC.
XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.
REXC is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while XES is Energy Equities. REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for REXC and 0.35% for XES.
Find the right allocation for REXC and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer