PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REXC vs. GXPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REXC vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


REXC

1D
3.68%
1M
-16.58%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GXPE

1D
-1.24%
1M
10.87%
6M
18.43%
YTD
32.81%
1Y
40.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
37.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.80K$20.93K$24.13K
$1.23M$1.30M$2.09M

REXC vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REXC and GXPE is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026

-0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REXC vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GXPE
GXPE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GXPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REXC vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REXCGXPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

REXC vs. GXPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REXC vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REXC drawdown since its inception was -38.04%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXC and GXPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REXCGXPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.04%

-15.73%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.52%

-5.72%

-26.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-4.28%

-9.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

Volatility

REXC vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REXCGXPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.51%

20.77%

+28.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.51%

20.65%

+28.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.51%

20.65%

+28.86%

REXC vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

REXC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

REXC vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM2025
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
2.10%1.20%
REXC
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REXC and GXPE have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for REXC.

GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.

REXC is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while GXPE is Energy Equities. REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for REXC and 0.15% for GXPE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REXC and GXPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer