REXC vs. IBAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) and IBAT (iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while IBAT is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REXC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBAT.

Performance

REXC vs. IBAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

REXC

• 1D: -4.49%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBAT

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 10.03%
• YTD: 64.52%
• 6M: 57.93%
• 1Y: 124.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REXC vs. IBAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF	7.90%
IBAT iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF	21.42%

Correlation

The correlation between REXC and IBAT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026	0.67

Return for Risk

REXC vs. IBAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBAT

IBAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
IBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
IBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
IBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REXC vs. IBAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REXC	IBAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	1.41	+0.14

Drawdowns

REXC vs. IBAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REXC drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum IBAT drawdown of -28.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXC and IBAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	REXC	IBAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-28.26%	+11.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-1.25%	-3.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-7.74%	+3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REXC	IBAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.48%	26.35%	+23.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.48%	23.83%	+25.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.48%	23.83%	+25.65%

REXC vs. IBAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

REXC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

REXC vs. IBAT - Dividend Comparison

REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IBAT iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF	0.70%	1.15%	1.37%
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REXC and IBAT in my portfolio?

REXC and IBAT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REXC or IBAT?

On fees, IBAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REXC or IBAT?

IBAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for REXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REXC or IBAT?

IBAT has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.

What is the main difference between REXC and IBAT?

REXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while IBAT is Alternative Energy Equities. REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while IBAT tracks STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for REXC and 0.47% for IBAT.