REG vs. VITL
REG (Regency Centers Corporation) and VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) are both stocks. REG operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while VITL operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, REG returned 7.74%/yr vs -13.31%/yr for VITL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REG vs. VITL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -66.81% return.
REG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
VITL
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 27.25%
- YTD
- -66.81%
- 6M
- -69.10%
- 1Y
- -67.07%
- 3Y*
- -8.37%
- 5Y*
- -13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
REG vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.54% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | 11.97% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -66.81% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -27.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and VITL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
REG:
$14.72B
VITL:
$472.63M
REG:
$3.55
VITL:
$1.05
REG:
22.61
VITL:
10.11
REG:
2.21
VITL:
0.02
REG:
8.62
VITL:
0.62
REG:
2.21
VITL:
1.43
REG:
$1.70B
VITL:
$784.41M
REG:
$814.76M
VITL:
$276.18M
REG:
$1.12B
VITL:
$82.41M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank
REG
VITL
REG vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REG | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.76 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | -0.80 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | -1.39 | +6.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REG vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and VITL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -84.20% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -84.20% | +76.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -84.20% | +69.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -84.20% | +54.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -79.77% | +79.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -47.34% | +31.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 48.17% | -44.82% |
Volatility
REG vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.45%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 17.37%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REG | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 17.37% | -12.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 48.28% | -37.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 61.63% | -45.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 54.16% | -31.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 53.73% | -23.85% |
Dividends
REG vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
REG vs. VITL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Vital Farms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
REG vs. VITL - Profitability Comparison
REG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 76.40M and revenue of 413.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.
VITL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
REG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 152.73M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
VITL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.
REG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 128.55M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
VITL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
REG and VITL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs VITL's -84.20%.
REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REG and VITL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer