VITL vs. QQQ
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -13.29%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -66.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return.
VITL
- 1D
- 5.95%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- -66.56%
- 6M
- -67.23%
- 1Y
- -70.42%
- 3Y*
- -6.77%
- 5Y*
- -13.29%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
VITL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -66.56% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -27.69% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 20.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and QQQ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between VITL and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
QQQ
VITL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VITL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.35 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.93 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 10.86 | -12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VITL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -82.97% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -11.96% | -72.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -22.77% | -61.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -35.12% | -49.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.62% | -4.25% | -75.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.47% | -32.73% | -14.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.72% | 3.22% | +46.50% |
Volatility
VITL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 15.94% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.94% | 9.17% | +6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.47% | 14.57% | +33.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.53% | 17.96% | +43.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.24% | 22.69% | +31.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.72% | 22.42% | +31.30% |
Dividends
VITL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and QQQ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer