VITL vs. DBA
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -6.07%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for DBA. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VITL vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -60.14% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 7.80% return.
VITL
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -55.25%
- YTD
- -60.14%
- 1Y
- -63.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- -6.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.52%
DBA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.27M | $23.75M | $33.82M | |
| $18.74M | $19.63M | $30.04M |
VITL vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -60.14% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -27.69% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 7.80% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | 15.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and DBA is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
DBA
VITL vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VITL | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.16 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 2.40 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VITL vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and DBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -67.97% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -8.67% | -75.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -12.36% | -71.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -15.94% | -68.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.71% | -24.11% | -51.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.98% | -40.97% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.54% | 4.19% | +51.35% |
Volatility
VITL vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 16.75% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 4.72%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.75% | 4.72% | +12.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.48% | 8.10% | +41.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.27% | 11.12% | +52.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.69% | 13.78% | +40.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.80% | 13.05% | +40.75% |
Dividends
VITL vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.32% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and DBA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (16.75%) compared to DBA (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs DBA's -67.97%.
DBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and DBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer