PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REG vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 4.12%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.52% annualized return.


REG

1D
0.43%
1M
6.55%
YTD
18.54%
6M
22.12%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
4.12%

SPYM

1D
0.53%
1M
0.36%
YTD
9.10%
6M
9.42%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REG vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
18.54%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%-12.00%3.62%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.10%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between REG and SPYM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between REG and SPYM has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REG vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.75

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

12.42

-7.15

REG vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REG vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.37%

-54.46%

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.90%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-18.72%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-24.48%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.02%

-33.87%

-23.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-2.35%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-7.15%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

1.97%

+1.38%

Volatility

REG vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.33%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

9.58%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

12.26%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

16.87%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.88%

18.03%

+11.85%

Dividends

REG vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than SPYM's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.70%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


REG and SPYM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REG has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to SPYM (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REG and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer