REG vs. SCHA
REG (Regency Centers Corporation) is a stock, while SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, REG returned 4.12%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for SCHA. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
REG vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 4.12%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
REG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
SCHA
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 22.49%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 43.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
REG vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.54% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.49% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and SCHA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between REG and SCHA has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
REG
SCHA
REG vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REG | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.38 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 16.08 | -10.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REG vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -42.41% | -30.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -9.50% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -27.29% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -30.79% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | -42.41% | -14.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -7.57% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.59% | +0.76% |
Volatility
REG vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.45%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REG | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 6.62% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 13.67% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 18.62% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 22.03% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 22.75% | +7.13% |
Dividends
REG vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than SCHA's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REG and SCHA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REG and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer