SCHA vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
SCHA and VB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both SCHA and VB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHA or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and VB is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHA vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCHA:
0.74
VB:
0.94
SCHA:
1.15
VB:
1.39
SCHA:
1.14
VB:
1.17
SCHA:
1.00
VB:
1.78
SCHA:
3.32
VB:
4.07
SCHA:
4.05%
VB:
3.78%
SCHA:
18.28%
VB:
16.38%
SCHA:
-42.41%
VB:
-59.57%
SCHA:
-6.45%
VB:
-5.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 2.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 8.62% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 8.97%.
SCHA
1.82%
-2.63%
6.93%
15.17%
8.70%
8.62%
VB
2.41%
-2.60%
8.71%
16.70%
9.49%
8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHA vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHA vs. VB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SCHA
VB
SCHA vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHA vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than VB's 1.27% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.82% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 1.69% | 2.39% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 2.58% | 1.47% | 2.39% | 2.52% | 1.78% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHA vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.