PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. SWSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHA having a 21.01% return and SWSSX slightly lower at 20.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 10.88% annualized return and SWSSX not far ahead at 10.97%.


SCHA

1D
-1.69%
1M
-1.21%
6M
14.27%
YTD
21.01%
1Y
33.94%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
10.88%

SWSSX

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.24%
6M
13.67%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
21.01%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
20.72%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and SWSSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.99

The correlation between SCHA and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
SWSSX

Technology

22.0%
19.1%

Healthcare

15.9%
16.3%

Financial Services

15.5%
15.5%

Industrials

14.6%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
7.9%

Real Estate

6.1%
5.9%

Energy

5.0%
5.3%

Basic Materials

4.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
2.2%

Utilities

2.2%
2.8%

Technology

SCHA
22.0%
SWSSX
19.1%

Healthcare

SCHA
15.9%
SWSSX
16.3%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.5%
SWSSX
15.5%

Industrials

SCHA
14.6%
SWSSX
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.4%
SWSSX
7.9%

Real Estate

SCHA
6.1%
SWSSX
5.9%

Energy

SCHA
5.0%
SWSSX
5.3%

Basic Materials

SCHA
4.0%
SWSSX
4.7%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.7%
SWSSX
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.5%
SWSSX
2.2%

Utilities

SCHA
2.2%
SWSSX
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHASWSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

3.03

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

10.73

+2.00

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SWSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and SWSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and SWSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHASWSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-60.34%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-11.00%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-27.50%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-31.93%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-41.81%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-1.52%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-10.69%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.11%

-0.44%

Volatility

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 4.88%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHASWSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.97%

4.88%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

14.21%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

19.53%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

22.64%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

24.05%

-1.31%

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHA and SWSSX have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHA vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than SWSSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.04%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.07%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SCHA and SWSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to SWSSX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and SWSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer