SCHA vs. SWSSX
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and SWSSX (Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from Charles Schwab - SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index while SWSSX tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 10.88%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for SWSSX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHA having a 21.01% return and SWSSX slightly lower at 20.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 10.88% annualized return and SWSSX not far ahead at 10.97%.
SCHA
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 1Y
- 33.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 13.67%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 34.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 21.01% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 20.72% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and SWSSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SCHA and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
SWSSX
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
SCHA
SWSSX
Healthcare
SCHA
SWSSX
Financial Services
SCHA
SWSSX
Industrials
SCHA
SWSSX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
SWSSX
Real Estate
SCHA
SWSSX
Energy
SCHA
SWSSX
Basic Materials
SCHA
SWSSX
Communication Services
SCHA
SWSSX
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
SWSSX
Utilities
SCHA
SWSSX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
SWSSX
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.03 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 10.73 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and SWSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -60.34% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -11.00% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -27.50% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -31.93% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -41.81% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -1.52% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -10.69% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.11% | -0.44% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 4.88%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 4.88% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 14.21% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.07% | 19.53% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 22.64% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 24.05% | -1.31% |
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHA and SWSSX have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than SWSSX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCHA and SWSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to SWSSX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and SWSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer