PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVY vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 27.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RDVY has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 15.65%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.


RDVY

1D
1.13%
1M
3.30%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.87%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
15.65%

CIBR

1D
-1.06%
1M
27.98%
YTD
27.16%
6M
21.95%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
27.82%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
11.06%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
27.16%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVY and CIBR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between RDVY and CIBR has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RDVY vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDVY
CIBR

Financial Services

36.5%

-

Technology

17.6%
94.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Industrials

12.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Communication Services

5.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

RDVY
36.5%
CIBR

-

Technology

RDVY
17.6%
CIBR
94.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RDVY
12.2%
CIBR

-

Industrials

RDVY
12.2%
CIBR
3.5%

Healthcare

RDVY
8.1%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

RDVY
5.4%
CIBR
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

RDVY
4.1%
CIBR

-

Energy

RDVY
1.4%
CIBR

-

Utilities

RDVY
1.4%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

RDVY

-

CIBR

-

Real Estate

RDVY

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDVYCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.14

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

2.71

+10.40

RDVY vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVY Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVY and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDVYCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.03

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.65

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.78

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.66

+0.01

Drawdowns

RDVY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVYCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-33.89%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-21.99%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-21.99%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-33.89%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

-33.89%

-6.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.84%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-8.66%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

9.26%

-7.12%

Volatility

RDVY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is 4.01%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that RDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVYCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

11.15%

-7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

20.93%

-9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

24.50%

-10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

24.95%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

23.59%

-2.48%

RDVY vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.91%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to RDVY (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.34% vs 15.65% for RDVY. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

RDVY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. RDVY tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RDVY and 0.60% for CIBR.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVY and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer